[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:41:11 -0700 |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>> I made a quick review of other image viewers:
>>
>> emacs gthumb geeqie eog
>> ----- ------ ------ ---
>> fit height and width Automatic Zoom 1:1 Best fit
>> <missing> Fit to window Fit image to window <missing>
>
> What is “Fit to window”? Does it distort the image
> by changing its height/width ratio?
No, it preserves the aspect ratio.
>> Perhaps we could even have a "smart" option that only scales images up
>> larger than some height and width, and otherwise leaves them in their
>> original size. That's probably the one I would like to use, now that I
>> think about it. (I usually prefer to scale images up, but as you point
>> out it's pretty useless to scale small icons to fit the window.)
>
> Maybe a new user option (disabled by default) could scale up
> like ImageMagick's '-resize' does.
What does that option do? (And yes, I imagine the above "smart"
resizing idea to be both optional and separate from the standard
options.)
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/04
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/04
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/05
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/05
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Juri Linkov, 2021/11/06
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/06