|
From: | Stefan Kangas |
Subject: | bug#17623: 24.4.50; incorrect example for `apply-partially' in (elisp) `Calling Functions' |
Date: | Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:14:13 -0700 |
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes: > Why again was saying something like "note that unlike the built-in > function this version accepts any number of arguments" rejected? Would this resolve any remaining confusion in this paragraph? If so, adding this sounds like a reasonable outcome. It is a true statement, and I don't think it risks confusing things further.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |