bug#31796: 27.1; dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace fails to find multiline regexps

[Drew Adams]

> > >> dired-do-find-regexp-and-replace could be left bound to Q, but
> > >> dired-do-query-replace-regexp could be bound to M-% in Dired.
> > >
> > > How will this help when the command to continue the loop is not
> > > bound to any key?
> >
> > dired-do-query-replace-regexp works like normal 'M-%' with 'y/n/!'
> > keys and automatically moves to the next file on multiple files.
> > So it seemes it doesn't need a key to continue the loop.
> 
> AFAIR, it does need a way to continue the loop if the user exits the
> loop.

If that feature is needed and broken, then that's true
for the command itself (`dired-do-query-replace-regexp'),
right?

It has nothing to do with whether or not that command
has a key binding, and even less to do with whether it
has the key binding `Q'.  No?

I guess you're (not saying but hinting?) that the
decision to take key `Q' away from that command also
took away the ability to continue the loop if the user
exits it.  If so, that too is (apparently) unfortunate.

But what does that have to do with giving that command a
key binding (e.g. `M-q')?

What am I missing?