[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:05:21 -0800 |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> If a file is to be autoloaded then it's up to that
> file whether it should have `lexical-binding' be t.
Agreed. Does this affect that in any way? I don't see how.
I just replied to a separate email of yours making the above point, so I
don't understand if you are simply making the same point twice, or if
this is a separate point.
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Drew Adams, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/11/25
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/25
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/11/25
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Stefan Monnier, 2020/11/25