[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil) |
Date: |
Wed, 06 May 2020 13:45:51 +0300 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On May 6, 2020 1:18:44 PM GMT+03:00, "Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org>
wrote:
> > The byte compiler also gets single-argument `apply' "wrong", so the
> latter would seem to be the best option, to me.
>
> Strong agreement! An 'apply' that actually does 'eval'...
> Will you write the patch or shall I?
Hmm... but Fapply clearly attempts to handle the case of zero arguments.
Richard do you remember what use cases was that supposed to handle?
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), (continued)
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Noam Postavsky, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Phil Sainty, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Mattias Engdegård, 2020/05/06
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Mattias Engdegård, 2020/05/06