[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combinati
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:14:45 +0300 |
> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
> Cc: Kenichi Handa <handa@gnu.org>, cedric.chepied@gmail.com,
> 14461@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 15:50:20 +0200
>
> Hm, I chose COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT and COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT more
> or less at random, but I do indeed see the sequence 'aU+0301U+0302' as
> two grapheme clusters (also with -Q): 'a' with an acute accent over it
> followed by a circumflex. In contrast, the sequences 'aU+0301U+0317'
> and 'aU+0302U+0317' are displayed as single grapheme clusters (317 is
> COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT BELOW). I also noticed that the seqence
> '-U+0301U+0302' is displayed as a dash followed by a single grapheme
> cluster of an acute accent and a circumflex; this holds for all
> nonalphabetic ASCII characters I tried and for some but not all
> non-ASCII alphabetic characters. So there seems to be some
> inconsistency in the display of combining characters.
Is this in Emacs 27 built with HarfBuzz support? If so, I think this
just means that the default font you use doesn't support these
combining accents, because on my system I see a single grapheme
cluster in both of the above cases, when I select a suitable font.
You can tell which font is used for each character by typing
"C-u C-x =" on each character/grapheme cluster.
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/08/15
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Stephen Berman, 2019/08/15
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Cédric Chépied, 2019/08/15
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Stephen Berman, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Stephen Berman, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Stephen Berman, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Stephen Berman, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Stephen Berman, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/17
- bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Stephen Berman, 2019/08/17
bug#14461: 24.3.50; bad display for 'space' + (U+0336) unicode combination, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/15