[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jul 2019 08:50:54 -0700 (PDT) |
> How about if we bind S-DOWN and S-UP to commands that scroll to EOB
> without introducing any new option? That would mimic pages like Less
> which stop at EOB with an unshifted key, but continue scrolling with a
> shifted key.
Yes. Some of us have been doing that individually (and not
using `scroll-lock-mode').
E.g.:
(global-set-key [S-down] (lambda () (interactive) (scroll-up 1)))
(global-set-key [S-up] (lambda () (interactive) (scroll-down 1)))
(But named functions are better than anonymous ones, for key binding.
And yes, it would be good to let a numeric prefix arg scroll that
many lines.)
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, marcowahlsoft, 2019/07/04
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/04
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Marco Wahl, 2019/07/04
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/04
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Marco Wahl, 2019/07/04
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Marco Wahl, 2019/07/04
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/13
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Marco Wahl, 2019/07/13
- bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/14
bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob,
Drew Adams <=
bug#36494: 27.0.50; [Proposition] New option to scroll up regardless of eob, Juri Linkov, 2019/07/04