[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:10:22 +0300 |
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 34765@debbugs.gnu.org, alexanderm@web.de
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:41:02 +0200
>
> > How 'bout adding an optional argument to `generate-new-buffer` to set
> > `inhibit_buffer_hooks`?
>
> How about moving 'generate-new-buffer' to C to set that flag without
> exposing it to Lisp (and to avoid things like
>
> ;; We can't use `generate-new-buffer' because files.el
> ;; is not yet loaded.
>
> in 'load-with-code-conversion')?
Fine with me.
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, (continued)
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/04/25
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/04/25
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/04/25
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/04/26
- bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/04/26
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Stefan Monnier, 2019/04/25
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/04/26
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2019/04/26
bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook, martin rudalics, 2019/04/27