[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33550: [PATCH] mention let* in if-let
|
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
|
Subject: |
bug#33550: [PATCH] mention let* in if-let |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:25:56 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Alex Branham <alex.branham@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 13:18:54 -0600
>>
>> I think this patch makes it much clearer that if-let functions like
>> let*, not let.
>
> Doesn't "in turn" already say that?
I think it's a bit ambiguous, it could refer to the fact that each
VALUEFORM is evaluted sequentially. It's not entirely obvious that
previous SYMBOL bindings are available to follow VALUEFORMs, as in let*
rather than let (which would be the more obvious choice for if-let as
opposed to if-let*).
- bug#33550: [PATCH] mention let* in if-let,
Noam Postavsky <=