[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#35222: 26.1; `read-command' documentation
|
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
|
Subject: |
bug#35222: 26.1; `read-command' documentation |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:24:14 -0400 |
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 18:14, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> 1. The doc string does not say what happens if DEFAULT is not provided
> (so `nil') and the user enters empty input. And what happens is not
> obvious. Please add that information to the doc string.
Um, can we declare the current behaviour a bug, and instead return nil
in this case? That matches the current doc string (i.e., return
DEFAULT-VALUE), and avoids the whole mess with the empty string symbol
which is weird and pretty useless as far as I can tell.