[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent
From: |
Winston |
Subject: |
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:33 EDT |
>> Sure, since I like it here, I might like it elsewhere, but I won't
>> know until those situations come up, and if I don't like it elsewhere,
>> then I'd be stuck.
> I'd like to know of one such example, if it happens.
OK, but if it's a couple years from now before it happens, I'm likely to
assume you're not still interested. :)
>> * xref-completion-ignore-case, default t;
>> * creating something that applies to both completions and
>> find-definition (I didn't save the patch, but my vague
>> recollection is that it just defaulted to using t for
>> completions).
> Not sure what this means, need details.
The first was a variable that only affects completions.
The second controls both completions and what xref-find-definitions
matches, so either both would allow case folding or both would not.
-WBE
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt, Winston, 2017/09/14
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent,
Winston <=
bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt, Winston, 2017/09/27