bug#23949: 25.0.95; Regression in handling error caused by (string-match-p "." nil)

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > I also think that the "breaks a lot of Elisp code" part is at least a
>> > tad exaggerated.
>> Binding inhibit-changing-match-data to t will pretty much break any
>> function that uses match-beginning or match-end.
> But those functions aren't supposed to run when string-match is
> called.

Yet they are in bug#23949.

In practice, there's always a discrepancy between what is supposed to
happen and what can happen in the general case ;-)

>> > (defsubst string-match-p (regexp string &optional start)
>> >   "\
>> > Same as `string-match' except this function does not change the match 
>> > data."
>> >   (condition-case err
>> >       (let ((inhibit-changing-match-data t))
>> >    (string-match regexp string start))
>> >     (error (signal (car err) (cdr err)))))
>> That will still cause the same problems when debug-on-signal is non-nil.
> So you don't consider this an improvement that should be installed?

No.

A simpler and more robust solution would be
(save-match-data (string-match regexp string start))

Of course, with either solution, it means that string-match-p is even
worse in terms of efficiency, whereas the unsuspecting coder would
rightfully expect string-match-p to be (slightly) *more* efficient than
string-match.


        Stefan