[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13949: (no subject)
From: |
Jaakov |
Subject: |
bug#13949: (no subject) |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:40:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
severity 13949 normal
thanks
Regarding severity: I protest to the previous resetting to minor.
I agree with Drew & Michael: I don't see why code-level arguments should
have any validity at all. The bug is a manifestation of noncompliance of
the current behavior with the documentation. A typical, normal bug, not
a wishlist one. There were no new arguments from Eli, just a statement
of disagreement.
I do see that a correct algorithm behind fill-paragraph would be not
completely trivial even for the text mode.
Thus, the bug is not 'minor' (= a problem which doesn't affect the
package's usefulness, AND is presumably trivial to fix).
I do not consider it 'wishlist' (= for any feature request, and also for
any bugs that are very difficult to fix due to major design
considerations), since it's
- neither a feature
- nor very difficult to fix due to major design considerations.
Regarding coding: unfortunately, no patches form my side in the next few
months. After that, unclear.
- bug#13949: (no subject),
Jaakov <=
- bug#13949: (no subject), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/22
- bug#13949: (no subject), Jaakov, 2016/03/22
- bug#13949: (no subject), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/22
- bug#13949: (no subject), Jaakov, 2016/03/22
- bug#13949: (no subject), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/22
- bug#13949: (no subject), Jaakov, 2016/03/22
- bug#13949: (no subject), Glenn Morris, 2016/03/22
- bug#13949: (no subject), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/23
- bug#13949: (no subject), Jaakov, 2016/03/23
- bug#13949: (no subject), John Wiegley, 2016/03/26