[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow
From: |
Peter Münster |
Subject: |
bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:10:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Feb 25 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> . gnus-buffers references killed buffers because Peter kills buffers
> behind Gnus back, instead of letting them be killed through
> gnus-kill-buffer, which would have removed them from gnus-buffers
This point is perhaps not 100% accurate. After 6h running, here some
more details about the situation:
- length of all_buffers: 74
- length of buffer-list: 45
- length of killed-buffer-names: 28
- length of gnus-buffers: 17
Content of killed-buffer-names:
Name Details
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
" *mm*" ???
" *mm*-292588" ???
" *mm*-331546" ???
" *mm*-391449" ???
" *mm*-531130" ???
" *mm*-59524" ???
" *mm*-705438" ???
" *mm*-971636" ???
" *nnmail message-id cache*" ???
" *nnml overview inbox*" ???
" *server news.gmane.org nntp *nntpd**" ???
" *server news.gmane.org nntp *nntpd**" ???
" *server news.povray.org nntp *nntpd**" ???
" *server news.povray.org nntp *nntpd**" ???
"*Backtrace*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*Completions*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*Completions*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*Help*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*Summary nndraft:drafts*" killed by gnus-summary-exit
"*Summary nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.comp.
embedded.openwrt.user*" killed by gnus-summary-exit
"*sent mail to SAV*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*sent mail to XXX*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*sent mail to YYY*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*unsent wide reply to Eli Zaretskii*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*unsent wide reply to SAV*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"*unsent wide reply to ZZZ*" killed by me with kill-buffer
"gnus-util.el" killed by me with kill-buffer
"jl-encrypt.el" killed by me with kill-buffer
There are 6 "#<killed buffer>" in gnus-buffers. That means, that I
should have killed the 6 buffers "*sent ..." and "*unsent ..." with
gnus-kill-buffer. I'll do that in the future. But what about the other buffers?
--
Peter
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, (continued)
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/24
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/24
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/24
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/24
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/24
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/24
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/25
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/24
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/25
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/25
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow,
Peter Münster <=
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/25
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/26
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/26
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/26
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/27
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Peter Münster, 2016/02/28
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/28
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/28
- bug#18522: killed buffers not GCed (was: bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow), Peter Münster, 2016/02/29
- bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/28