[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21850: 25.0.50; Remapped next(previous)-line to ibuffer-for(back)war
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#21850: 25.0.50; Remapped next(previous)-line to ibuffer-for(back)ward-line |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:12:42 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tino Calancha <f92capac@gmail.com> writes:
> Remapped next(previous)-line to ibuffer-forward(backward)-line
>
> * lisp/ibuffer.el (ibuffer-mode-map): same remap is applied on dired.
[...]
> diff --git a/lisp/ibuffer.el b/lisp/ibuffer.el
> index 89477bd..a81b1cb 100644
> --- a/lisp/ibuffer.el
> +++ b/lisp/ibuffer.el
> @@ -487,8 +487,10 @@ ibuffer-mode-map
>
> ;; immediate operations
> (define-key map (kbd "n") 'ibuffer-forward-line)
> + (define-key map [remap next-line] 'ibuffer-forward-line)
> (define-key map (kbd "SPC") 'forward-line)
> (define-key map (kbd "p") 'ibuffer-backward-line)
> + (define-key map [remap previous-line] 'ibuffer-backward-line)
> (define-key map (kbd "M-}") 'ibuffer-forward-next-marked)
> (define-key map (kbd "M-{") 'ibuffer-backwards-next-marked)
> (define-key map (kbd "l") 'ibuffer-redisplay)
In my opinion, we should avoid changing the `next/previous-line'
commands unless we have a very good reason for doing so. (For instance,
I think it's a mistake that dired remaps those keys.) So I'm closing
this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#21850: 25.0.50; Remapped next(previous)-line to ibuffer-for(back)ward-line,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=