bug#22604: 24.5; (elisp) `Key Binding Conventions': what about other `C-c' keys?

[Drew Adams]

> > For example, Lars recently proposed, in bug thread 22172, to bind
> > `C-c +' and `C-c -' by default.  Making the doc clearer about this
> > would preclude such a suggestion, as those keys would fall under
> > the category of "other punctuation", which is reserved for minor modes.
> 
> Then they cannot be used if we follow our conventions.  That looks clear
> enough to me.

You feel that the convention is clear enough for you.

Although I might agree with your interpretation of the convention
as currently stated, I would like it to be stated more clearly,
explicitly saying what it means by "punctuation", for example.