[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:45:26 -0800 (PST) |
> >> They don't seem to return anything useful. Closing.
> >
> > Where do you get off saying that? Of course it is useful to
> > use the return value of a motion function. It saves a call to
> > `point', which can simplify the code. (Yes, simple and beautiful
> > is in the eye of the reader. But the point is that it is normal
> > for users to make use of the return value of a motion function
> > that is side-effect free. Reopening.
>
> If other developers disagree with my closing the bug, they can
> reopen.
>
> Reclosing.
I already did disagree. This is quite ludicrous. Just how
do you think you are improving things by doing this?
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/08
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Drew Adams, 2014/02/09
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/09
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Stefan Monnier, 2014/02/10
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/10
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Drew Adams, 2014/02/11
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/11
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Drew Adams, 2014/02/11
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/11
- bug#15117: 24.3.50; doc of `(forward|backward)-*': state return value, Drew Adams, 2014/02/11