|
From: | Leo Liu |
Subject: | bug#11906: 24.1; completion-at-point failures |
Date: | Fri, 06 Dec 2013 13:36:52 +0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.9) |
On 2013-12-06 12:32 +0800, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > I don't understand what you mean by "doesn't need a completion table". > Could you give an example? See completion-at-point: (let ((newstart (car-safe (funcall hookfun)))) (and newstart (= newstart start))) so basically every command following completion-at-point calls HOOKFUN to check if start matches, in this case it doesn't need the completion table. Hopefully There will be more places to optimise if studying minibuffer.el in more details. Leo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |