[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14399: octave-mode bug
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#14399: octave-mode bug |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:19:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> That's the part I knew already ;-)
>>
>> But in which way is
>>
>> a = [ foo;...
>> bar ]
>>
>> different from
>>
>> a = [ foo
>> bar ]
>> or
>> a = [ foo;
>> bar ]
> For these three examples there is no difference because the newlines and
> whitespace the continuation marker gobbles up wouldn't terminate or
> alter the statement.
Thanks. So it begs the question: why would someone write
a = [ foo;...
bar ]
instead of one of the other two? I'm trying to understand what's the
intention behind it, to better understand how the code should behave.
Stefan