|
| From: | Stefan Monnier |
| Subject: | bug#14886: Fwd: bug#14886: Fwd: A significant slowdown calling font-lock-fontify-buffer from a hook |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:03:45 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> I've tried a brief ediff between the font-lock files in 24.3 and trunk,
>> but haven't spotted the difference yet in font-lock-fontify-buffer which
>> I suspect is there.
> Why should there be any difference? The value that differs is that of
> `font-lock-fontify-buffer-function'. Calling `font-lock-fontify-buffer'
> from prog-mode does `font-lock-default-fontify-buffer'. Calling it from
> c-mode does `jit-lock-refontify'. Or what am I missing?
So it's back to the problem of font-lock-fontify-buffer meaning two
different things. Could someone look into providing
font-lock-ensure-fontification and font-lock-mark-for-refontification,
and mark font-lock-fontify-buffer obsolete?
Stefan
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |