[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:51:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Politz <politza@hochschule-trier.de> writes:
> Also, people may be keeping ancient mail around, containing dates which
> may be parsed by the current function.
Yes, but perhaps your regexp-based parser could be extended to parse
those, too? Ancient date formats looked quite RFC2822-ey, too.
> Anyway here is an updated version, incorporating 2-digit years and
> textual timezones.
Looks good.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, (continued)
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/07/04
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Andreas Politz, 2013/07/04
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/07/04
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Andreas Politz, 2013/07/04
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/07/04
- Message not available
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2013/07/06
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Andreas Politz, 2013/07/06
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2013/07/06
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Andreas Politz, 2013/07/06
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Andreas Politz, 2013/07/06
- bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance, Andreas Politz, 2013/07/04