[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1 |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:01:17 -0800 |
> In lighter vein, I still remember the old days when I looked at
> "hi-yellow" and thought that it was a "very bright yellow"
> and searched for "lo-yellow".
>
> No, I am not making the above story up.
;-)
Not very important, but is there a reason why the prefix `hi-lock-' is not used
here as elsewhere? (And perhaps it should be added to the defgroup.)
- bug#13686: 24.3.50; Re-look hi-lock-face-defaults (aka Provide more "core" faces for highlighting), (continued)
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, David Koppelman, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Juri Linkov, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/27
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26