[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:19:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> BTW, one more useful option would be "run it when the current command
>> finishes".
> IIUC, this will require adding a queue of postponed commands,
You could just add-function on the process-sentinel.
But as pointed out elsewhere, another option is to actually let both
processes run in the same buffer.
Stefan
bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/08
bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question, jidanni, 2013/02/08
bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question, jidanni, 2013/02/10
bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question, jidanni, 2013/02/10
bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question, jidanni, 2013/02/10