[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13273: 24.3.50; [PATCH] enhancement request: repeatable `visual-line
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#13273: 24.3.50; [PATCH] enhancement request: repeatable `visual-line-mode' line movements |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:35:41 -0800 |
Again, so I can better understand your messages, did you try the patch?
> Yet, another pattern: repeated invocations of C-a cycle between visual
> and logical bols.
Is that a suggestion of something you want or a complaint about what you see
happening with the patch?
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but I think that with the
> > key bindings the patch makes, `home' and `end' should do what you
> > are requesting.
>
> Indeed they do, but home/end are inconvenient keys.
I agree. But the idea was to (a) make the home/end bindings compatible with
what some users expect from outside Emacs, but also (b) make them repeatable.
My only request is that we give repeatable commands to all of `C-a', `C-e',
`home', and `end' for visual line mode and also globally. Which keys get which
bindings is less important to me. But I happen to agree with you, personally,
that I would use `C-a' and `C-e', not `home' and `end'.
> I very much like the idea of the repeated invocation of C-a doing something
> more than just staying at the beginning of line.
Right. That's the idea.
> The point is that I don't find moving to the next/previous line a very
> useful feature. C-p/C-n do just that.
They do not track bol/eol. If you mean first do `C-a' then `C-p C-p ...', then
OK. I personally find that less convenent than just holding down `C-a'. And
for eol it doesn't work at all, because of different line lengths.
> What I propose is to be able to use the same key (C-a) for jumping to
> both, visual and logical bols according to some user specified rule
> (cycling for example). And your patch is very close to making that
> possible.
Feel free to make a concrete suggestion (code).
What I agree with you on (so far) are:
a. Users should be able to do repeated bol/eol for both visual and logical
lines, in visual line mode.
b. For my personal use, at least, I will favor `C-a'/`C-e' over `home'/`end'.
I've used the same repeatable `C-a'/`C-e' thingie for non visual-line mode for a
long time. I wouldn't be without it. Some reasonable extension to visual-line
mode should be similarly helpful. And we should be able to accommodate the
"conventional" use of `home'/`end' as well, just making their actions
repeatable.
bug#13273: 24.3.50; [PATCH] enhancement request: repeatable `visual-line-mode' line movements, Vitalie Spinu, 2012/12/28
bug#13273: 24.3.50; [PATCH] enhancement request: repeatable `visual-line-mode' line movements, Drew Adams, 2012/12/28
bug#13273: 24.3.50; [PATCH] enhancement request: repeatable `visual-line-mode' line movements, Vitalie Spinu, 2012/12/28
bug#13273: 24.3.50; [PATCH] enhancement request: repeatable `visual-line-mode' line movements, Drew Adams, 2012/12/28