[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:26:15 +0100 |
> My concern is mainly from the user's point of view. This is a trap that
> is there to trick every user as soon as they start using lisp expression
> for COMMAND. And if we let dired-mark-pop-up run in the HIDDEN ' *marked
> files*' buffer without throwing an error, users might grow to rely on
> it. Harder to get it right later.
I don't understand. `dired-mark-pop-up' displays that buffer, so why do
you mean it's hidden? It is considered "ephemeral and generally
uninteresting to the user" so Emacs won't switch to it automatically.
martin
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Leo, 2012/12/11
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Glenn Morris, 2012/12/11
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Juri Linkov, 2012/12/12
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Leo, 2012/12/12
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Juri Linkov, 2012/12/12
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Leo, 2012/12/12
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Juri Linkov, 2012/12/13
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Leo, 2012/12/13
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Leo, 2012/12/14
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, martin rudalics, 2012/12/14
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, martin rudalics, 2012/12/14
- bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed, Juri Linkov, 2012/12/15