bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#12832: 24.3.50; Emacs lockup when idle


From: Andy Moreton
Subject: bug#12832: 24.3.50; Emacs lockup when idle
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 10:48:31 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2

On 09/11/2012 09:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:33:11 +0000
From: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton@gmail.com>
CC: 12832@debbugs.gnu.org

I rebuild emacs every day from trunk, but only do a full bootstrap when
necessary. I have updated the Mingw compiler this week though, so that could
be an issue.

Was the build optimized?  (I'm guessing not, but I want to be sure.)

system-configuration-options includes --no-opt, so unoptimized.

Emacs was not consuming any cycles - the system was completely idle.

OK.  Any idea why you had so many threads?  Normally, Emacs 24.3.50
should have only 3: the main thread, the input thread, and a thread
that runs atimers (Emacs arranges for a timer to fire every 2 seconds,
to check whether any new input has arrived.)  Yet another thread, the
4th one, is automatically started by the OS when you attach a debugger
to Emacs, and this is it:

   Thread 6 (Thread 8744.0x2080):
   #0  0x7c90120f in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg () from 
C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
   No symbol table info available.
   #1  0x7c952119 in ntdll!KiIntSystemCall () from C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
   No symbol table info available.

But what are the other 2 threads you have, namely:
[snipped]
> One of them appears to be reading something, the other is waiting for
> some event.  Did you have some subprocess running or some network
> connection active at that time?  Or maybe your routine operation has
> some subprocesses (a speller, perhaps?) and/or network connections
> active?

I have some files open via tramp (pscp method) on another machine. This uses putty for ssh (plink.exe) and scp (pscp.exe) for file tranfers. At the time of the lockup, emacs had a CMD.EXE subprocess running plink.exe.

> We need more data points on this.

I'll see if this is reproduceable and try to get more info.

Thanks.









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]