[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#3646: "bookmark format upgrade is incorrect"
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
bug#3646: "bookmark format upgrade is incorrect" |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Oct 2012 00:05:40 -0500 |
Hey, Drew.
So, it's quite understandable you're confused -- the reason is that
Debbugs apparently *dropped* the rest of the body of the mail in which I
set this ticket to WONTFIX.
That is, the first line of my mail was
"tags 3646 wontfix"
but then the rest of the mail said this:
I'm tagging this as WONTFIX, because the cost/benefit ratio of fixing
it is too low -- it's hard to fix, and there have been not many
reports of it biting people in the wild. Of course I have no way to
know the real cost of not fixing it; the bug tracker is an imperfect
channel.
I did spend a long time working on fixing that interim format upgrade
path. It is clearly doable, but I didn't finish then and I've lost
the head state (that was more than a year ago).
If anyone has reason to think this bug is a major problem right now,
please make a noise here.
But apparently I was just supposed to know that Debbugs would not
automatically attache my comments to the only bug mentioned in the
control line, and that I had to CC 3646@ or 3646-foo@ explicitly.
Hope the above explains it better.
See also http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12507#105 .
Sigh :-).
Best,
-K