[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:54:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 |
On 07/16/2012 08:04 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Wouldn't this inline all the functions declared 'inline'?
No, only the functions defined after the macro.
<string.h> functions, for example, are unaffected.
> I think we need a facility for doing this
> only with a few functions that affect performance.
I considered that (with a macro "Inline"), but it'd complicate
maintenance. I hope that the simpler approach is good enough.
If not, we can revisit this, and quite possibly if we do that
we'll do "Inline" or something like it.
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Richard Stallman, 2012/07/16
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/16
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/16
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions,
Paul Eggert <=
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/23
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/24
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/25
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Chong Yidong, 2012/07/15