[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:09:26 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:57:31 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> CC: 9000@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On 06/23/2012 03:48 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > dispnew.c:5960: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range
> > of data type
> > ...
> > I think any host with a signed 32-bit time_t will see this warning.
>
> I don't observe the problem on either Fedora 15 or Ubuntu 12.04
> compiled for x86 (these used signed 32-bit time_t). I tried both
> gcc 4.6.3 and gcc 4.7.1 (which is the latest stable version).
>
> If memory serves, warnings like that occur only with older GCCs and
> are harmless, and the GCC folks fixed the bogus warnings after the
> gnulib folks complained about them. Maybe time to upgrade your GCC?
No, I don't want to upgrade my GCC because of this. Is it possible to
fix the cause of the warning instead?
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/22
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/24
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/24
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23
- bug#9000: patch for higher-resolution time stamps, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/06/24