[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days
From: |
Ken Brown |
Subject: |
bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:51:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 |
On 4/11/2012 3:26 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I think we should put our money where our mouth is. If we consider
> Cygwin 1.5 unsupported, we should at least warn the prospective users
> that they are building Emacs with unsupported tools.
>
> So yes, I think we should insert a warning now. Could you please make
> such a change? TIA.
How's this:
=== modified file 'configure.in'
--- configure.in 2012-04-02 04:38:31 +0000
+++ configure.in 2012-04-12 02:38:52 +0000
@@ -3805,6 +3805,14 @@
echo
fi
+if test "${opsys}" = "cygwin"; then
+ cygwin_rel=`uname -r|sed -e 's/\(^1\.[[579]]\)\..*/\1/'`
+ if test "${cygwin_rel}" = "1.5"; then
+ echo
+ echo "*** Warning: Building Emacs on Cygwin 1.5 is not supported."
+ echo
+ fi
+fi
# Remove any trailing slashes in these variables.
[test "${prefix}" != NONE &&
FYI, here's what the output of `uname -r' looks like on Cygwin:
$ uname -r
1.7.14s(0.260/5/3)
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/04/10
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Chong Yidong, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Ken Brown, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Ken Brown, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days,
Ken Brown <=
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Glenn Morris, 2012/04/12
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/12
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/12
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Ken Brown, 2012/04/12
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Drew Adams, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Ken Brown, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Drew Adams, 2012/04/11