[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k'
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k' |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:19:01 +0100 |
> If I have ido-mode enabled, the output of `C-h k C-x C-f' is:
>
>> C-x C-f runs the command ido-find-file, which is an interactive
>> compiled Lisp function in `ido.el'.
>
>
> But if I'm just learning Emacs and I do `C-h ? k C-x C-f', the output is for
(non-ido) find-file:
>
>> C-x C-f runs the command find-file, which is an interactive compiled
>> Lisp function in `files.el'.
FWIW this is due to `make-help-screen' binding `minor-mode-map-alist' to
nil. Applying the patch below seems to fix it, but maybe someone more
knowledgeable has a better solution. (If you want to try the patch,
make sure to recompile help.el after compiling help-macro.el).
martin
*** lisp/help-macro.el 2011-01-25 04:08:28 +0000
--- lisp/help-macro.el 2012-01-09 18:05:39 +0000
***************
*** 186,192 ****
(setq config nil))
;; `defn' must make sure that its frame is
;; selected, so we won't iconify it below.
! (call-interactively defn)
(when new-frame
;; Do not iconify the selected frame.
(unless (eq new-frame (selected-frame))
--- 186,193 ----
(setq config nil))
;; `defn' must make sure that its frame is
;; selected, so we won't iconify it below.
! (let ((minor-mode-map-alist
new-minor-mode-map-alist))
! (call-interactively defn))
(when new-frame
;; Do not iconify the selected frame.
(unless (eq new-frame (selected-frame))
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', David Röthlisberger, 2012/01/08
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k',
martin rudalics <=
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', Glenn Morris, 2012/01/17
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', David Röthlisberger, 2012/01/19
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/19
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', David Röthlisberger, 2012/01/19
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', Glenn Morris, 2012/01/19
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', David Röthlisberger, 2012/01/19
- bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k', martin rudalics, 2012/01/20