[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:04:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> Another fix might be for C-x k to use confirm-nonexistent-file-or-buffer
> so that after you type TAB, Emacs prompts with [Confirm] when you try to
> exit the minibuffer immediately.
>
> How would that change it? The buffer ` *message-viewer RMAIL*' did
> exist.
It would probably have stopped you from accidentally entering the
internal buffer by typing RET quickly after TAB.
I agree though that the completion behavior is a bit screwy: typing TAB
into the empty minibuffer does not bring up the hidden buffers in the
completion list, whereas the more agressive partial-completion method
does bring them up.
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Richard Stallman, 2011/09/24
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Chong Yidong, 2011/09/24
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Richard Stallman, 2011/09/24
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/24
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/25
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Richard Stallman, 2011/09/25
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/25
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Richard Stallman, 2011/09/25
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Drew Adams, 2011/09/25
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion,
Chong Yidong <=
- bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Richard Stallman, 2011/09/25
bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Stefan Monnier, 2011/09/29
bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/30
bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Stefan Monnier, 2011/09/30
bug#9591: 24.0.50; buffer name completion, Stefan Monnier, 2011/09/25