|
From: | Andreas Schwab |
Subject: | bug#2179: 23.0.60; define-key vs define-key-after key syntax |
Date: | Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:14:13 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes: > Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes: > >>>> Since define-key-after is only useful for menu-bar bindings which don't >>>> use characters in keys this doesn't look like a serious restriction. >>> >>> The doc string of `define-key-after' doesn't say that it's only for >>> menu-bar bindings. >> >> define-key-after is a compiled Lisp function in `subr.el'. >> [...] >> The order of bindings in a keymap matters when it is used as a menu. > > So? Yes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |