[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisib
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible' |
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2011 07:32:04 -0700 |
> >> The same idea can be used with syntax-ppss to skip over
> >> matches that are inside comments/strings.
>
> > Yes, but why not have this built into the search functions
> > themselves, just as is done for isearch?
>
> Because I'd rather that the low-level functions do one thing and one
> thing well.
Sure. Define `re-search-forward' & compagnie in Lisp.
Have them call C functions that each do one simple thing well.
That way, existing code that uses these long-standing functions can benefit from
this feature (or can ignore it) just by binding a variable.
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Drew Adams, 2011/05/17
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/17
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Drew Adams, 2011/05/17
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/17
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Lennart Borgman, 2011/05/17
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Drew Adams, 2011/05/17
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Lennart Borgman, 2011/05/18
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/18
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible', Lennart Borgman, 2011/05/18
- bug#8686: 24.0.50; `re-search-backward' does not respect `search-invisible',
Drew Adams <=