[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:35:48 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:41:40 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> CC: 8545@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On 04/29/11 04:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I also don't like the calls to `abort' you
> > introduced. I understand the motivation (detection of invalid Emacs
> > code), but why not make it call `error' instead
>
> Yes, that would be fine.
I installed such a change.
Btw, none of the platforms currently defines HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT or
HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT, AFAICS.
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, (continued)
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Richard Stallman, 2011/04/29
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/29
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/29
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Richard Stallman, 2011/04/30
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/28
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/28
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/29
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/29
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/29
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/30