[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:37:44 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> * doprnt returns size_t. But Stefan wrote that he prefers sizes to be
>> signed values, and doprnt always returns a value that can fit in
>> EMACS_INT. So shouldn't doprnt return EMACS_INT, as it did before?
> I made it return size_t because all the related variables in verror
> are size_t, and I didn't want to mix signed with unsigned. AFAIU, the
> preference to use signed is for those values that come from Lisp or go
> back to the Lisp level, which is not the case here.
Mixing the two is what I find problematic, so if it's size_t all the
way, that's OK.
Stefan
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/25
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/25
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/26
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/27
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/27
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/27
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/27
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/04/28
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Paul Eggert, 2011/04/28
- bug#8545: issues with recent doprnt-related changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/04/28