[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:31:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Not necessarily. I, for example, have lots of mail archives from past
> years, all in Babyl format (they are files produced by the `o'
> command). I don't intend to convert all of them to mbox, but I might
> want to run Rmail on them occasionally.
>
> Not sure what that means for what you are trying to argue.
Ignore the last paragraph of my previous mail.
I was merely trying to say that I think it is important to get this right
_before_ 23.1.
The specifics are in the preceding paragraphs.
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, (continued)
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/10
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/14
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/15
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd,
Glenn Morris <=
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/04/16
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/17
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/17
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Richard M Stallman, 2009/04/18
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Glenn Morris, 2009/04/20
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Stefan Monnier, 2009/04/20
- bug#2941: rmail's new handling of Babyl files is odd, Stefan Monnier, 2009/04/18