[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#2136: cleanup: Fresume_tty and Fsuspend_tty
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#2136: cleanup: Fresume_tty and Fsuspend_tty |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:00:15 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:22:16 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
> Cc: 2136@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
>
> Can you have multiple ttys in MSDOS?
No, of course not. Not if by ``tty'' you mean an interactive
terminal.
> Otherwise suspend-frame won't call supend-tty.
It can be tricked into doing that, since the test in controlling-tty-p
is very naive.
> > For resume-tty, I just invoked it directly.
>
> See above, this function only makes sens when using multiple ttys.
If you mean the full functionality, then yes, I agree. However, since
the current uses of these two functions are so few, I cannot yet say
that having them not fboundp will or won't do harm for the DOS port.
For now, they are more or less no-ops, which certainly doesn't do any
harm, at least AFAICS.
On the other hand, keeping them out of the DOS build would mean the
same #ifdef's will have to stay, just in different places, which won't
make the sources more clean, IMO.