[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:03:20 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> Cc: 2022@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:45:59 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > The old (pre-mbox) Rmail also had the unseen attribute, but it never
> > marked the Rmail buffer modified when it was removed.
>
> That's a good argument. I wonder how it worked...
By setting the buffer's modified flag, like it's done everywhere else.
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/24
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/24
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/24
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/25
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/25
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/25
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/25
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/29
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/30
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/30
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/30
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Kevin Rodgers, 2009/01/30
- bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/24