[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1334: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations
From: |
Shigeru Fukaya |
Subject: |
bug#1334: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:04:34 +0900 |
Hi, Chong,
I agree it's too aggressive. I'd just sought for the best.
Could you separate out the byte-optimize-*-functions part of the patch?
They are mutually affected. So I'll make and send a patch of
byte-opt.el that includes minimal changes to the latest CVS. It is
necessary because the current byte-opt.el still has problems I
pointed. It will take a few days.
Is it ok?
Regards,
Shigeru
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chong Yidong" <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: "Shigeru Fukaya" <shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com>
Cc: <1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations
Hi Shigeru,
I've been looking through your changes to byte-opt.el. They look good,
but some of the changes are a little too agressive for my tastes, so
close to pretest.
Could you separate out the byte-optimize-*-functions part of the patch?
A mistake in any of these lists could lead to some hard-to-track errors.
If in doubt, let's simply not perform the optimization for now. We can
apply these changes after the release.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chong Yidong" <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: "Shigeru Fukaya" <shigeru.fukaya@gmail.com>
Cc: <1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations
Hi Shigeru,
I've been looking through your changes to byte-opt.el. They look good,
but some of the changes are a little too agressive for my tastes, so
close to pretest.
Could you separate out the byte-optimize-*-functions part of the patch?
A mistake in any of these lists could lead to some hard-to-track errors.
If in doubt, let's simply not perform the optimization for now. We can
apply these changes after the release.