bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#1175: marked as done (23.0.60; bookmark code regression)


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#1175: marked as done (23.0.60; bookmark code regression)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:50:03 -0700

Your message dated Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:44:55 -0400
with message-id <87skqfnvmw.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: 23.0.60; bookmark code regression 
has caused the Emacs bug report #1175,
regarding 23.0.60; bookmark code regression
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
1175: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1175
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 23.0.60; bookmark code regression Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:51:27 -0700
Please, please restore the sane behavior of `bookmark-jump-noselect'
as it was for Emacs 22: it should return a cons (BUFFER . POINT)
when a bookmark is located.
 
This breaks third-party code that calls `bookmark-jump-noselect'.
 
 
In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2008-10-03 on LENNART-69DE564
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include
-fno-crossjumping'
 




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: 23.0.60; bookmark code regression Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:44:55 -0400
I've checked in code that renames bookmark-jump-noselect to
bookmark-handle-bookmark, with a bookmark-jump-noselect wrapper.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]