bug#878: marked as done (indent-rigidly-reverse)

[Emacs bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:00:15 -0400
with message-id <jwvljy857vs.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#878: indent-rigidly-reverse
has caused the Emacs bug report #878,
regarding indent-rigidly-reverse
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
878: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> indent-rigidly-reverse
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:54:36 +0800
>
>
>
>
> indent-rigidly is great, as I hit C-x C-i over and over, the lines
> more further and further to the right.
>
> OK, now I hereby challenge you to move those lines slowly back the
> other way in the same fashion. Simple you say: use an argument of -1.
> But then it becomes a giant pain trying to do that over and over.
>
> OK, one could make a keyboard macro to do it, but still no fun.
> Hitting C-x e over and over is much harder than e.g., C-x C-e, which
> often one hits by accident when trying to hit the former.
>
> Therefore you should implement a indent-rigidly-reverse and bind it to
> some key, else you are offering one-way joyrides.
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#878: indent-rigidly-reverse
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:00:15 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> >> Hitting C-x e over and over is much harder than e.g., C-x C-e, which
> > In Emacs-22, both C-x z and C-x e can be repeated with "C-x z z z z z"
> > or "C-x e e e e e".  Both are solutions to your problem:
>
> > C-u - 1 C-x C-i C-x z z z z z z z z
>
>
> --- End Message ---