[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1)
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1) |
Date: |
19 Feb 2002 12:20:39 -0700 |
>>>>> "Francesco" == Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org> writes:
Francesco> Maybe this would better be handled by not giving file X to
Francesco> etags to parse. Should etags correct this common makefile
Francesco> error?
It would be better to fix the Makefile, but it isn't always easy. For
instance, this would mean adding another big chunk of obscure sh code
to automake's output. (I'll investigate it though. Maybe it isn't as
bad as I think.)
Tom
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), (continued)
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Tom Tromey, 2002/02/18
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Francesco Potorti`, 2002/02/18
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Sven Utcke, 2002/02/19
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), David Masterson, 2002/02/19
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/19
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), David Masterson, 2002/02/19
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/20
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Sven Utcke, 2002/02/20
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Francesco Potorti`, 2002/02/20
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), David Masterson, 2002/02/20
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1),
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Richard Stallman, 2002/02/19
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Sven Utcke, 2002/02/19
- Re: Bug Report (Feature request?) etags (GNU Emacs 21.1), Sven Utcke, 2002/02/18