[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired default Feature request
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: dired default Feature request |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 15:39:17 +0200 (IST) |
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001,
=?utf-8?b?0KE=?=.=?utf-8?b?0JE=?=.=?utf-8?b?0J/QvtC60YDQvtCy0YHQutC40Lk=?=
wrote:
> I suggest that both
>
> dired-recursive-deletes and
> dired-recursive-copies
>
> should default to 'top. IMHO this is much more common behavior for a
> file manager (e.g. MidnightCommander, M$ Windows Explorer), it is more
> convenient as sufficiently safe (the user is asked to confirm the
> action).
OTOH, I think Unix and GNU/Linux users are used to the current default.
> OTOH, I failed to find the variables in question by
> `h-i recursive delete' or `h-i dired recursive'
> (it is there for `h-i dired-recursive'). If changing the defaults is
> judged unacceptable, I suggest that `recursive delete', `recursive
> copy' and `dired recursive' be entered into the info index.
I don't know if the default will be changed, but I added index entries
"recursive deletion" and "recursive copying" anyway.
Thanks.
- dired default Feature request, С.Б.Покровский, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: dired default Feature request, David Kastrup, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request, Peter S Galbraith, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request, David Kastrup, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request, David Kastrup, 2001/11/01
- Re: dired default Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
Re: dired default Feature request, David Kastrup, 2001/11/01