[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:45:51 +0300 |
Kai Großjohann wrote:
>
> eliz@is.elta.co.il (Eli Zaretskii) writes:
>
> > The issue here is that there's no such thing as "FSF Emacs". It's
> > usually a term used by people who have derogatory attitude towards GNU
> > Emacs; thus Richard's comment, especially since the rest of your message
> > did sound quite angry.
>
> I presume it was not meant that way. The OP didn't know that "FSF
> Emacs" is derogatory, and didn't intend to put off anyone with his
> (her?) wording.
The angry language and the references to XEmacs seemed to suggest
otherwise. Being a non-native English speaker, I could have been mistaken,
but the fact is that Richard understood it that way as well.
- Re: Futile bug reports?, (continued)
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/19
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/21
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/21
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/22
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/22
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/23
- Re: Futile bug reports?, David desJardins, 2001/08/24
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/24
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kevin Gallagher, 2001/08/26
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/26
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Alan Mackenzie, 2001/08/16
Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/10
Re: Futile bug reports?, David R. Linn, 2001/08/14
Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman <address@hidden>, 2001/08/16
Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/19