[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming co
From: |
Denis Shirokov |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention? |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Dec 2018 20:37:33 +0200 |
" P.S. Perhaps I should make SYMTAB (and FUNCTAB) read-only. "
please don't do that about SYMTAB :)
*panic
2018-11-29 9:28 GMT+02:00, address@hidden <address@hidden>:
> Peng Yu <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I see that you gawk allows things like "f oo" in SYMTAB.
>
> RTFM, which clearly states that you can also add additional elements
> into SYMTAB and access them like regular array elements. Doing so
> DOES NOT create variables with weird names.
>
> Arnold
>
> P.S. Perhaps I should make SYMTAB (and FUNCTAB) read-only.
>
>
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?,
Denis Shirokov <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, Peng Yu, 2018/12/02
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, arnold, 2018/12/02
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, Wolfgang Laun, 2018/12/02
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, Peng Yu, 2018/12/02
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, arnold, 2018/12/03
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, Andrew J. Schorr, 2018/12/03
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, arnold, 2018/12/03
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, Andrew J. Schorr, 2018/12/03
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, arnold, 2018/12/03
- Re: [bug-gawk] Access variables not conforming to the variable naming convention?, Andrew J. Schorr, 2018/12/03