Re: Bison 1.30g

[Pascal Bart]

> >Well, "bison.simple" has absolutly no vocation for C++ generation, so why
> >should we change that ? wait we generate real C++ parse, but I don't want
> >to see std::size_t in bison.simple.
>
> Are you just back from vacation? -- We have worked on fixing this C compile
> as C++ compatibility for a week now. :-)

Yes, I'm coming back :), and I've not follow all bison changes. I've juste seen
now, bison.simple has better C++ compatibility.

I want better compatibility for generated parser, but the most of C++ compiler
don't like namespace, I haven't a great experience with C++ portability, and I
prefer leave Akim and Paul take decisions about that.

> The file bison.simple already has "std::" on all names when compiling under
> C++, including size_t, except when using alloca.

Well, bison.simple already uses std::size_t, so we could change the forget
std::size_t. Sorry, I'll try to understand, why there're no problem with that.

Thanks
--
Pascal Bart (address@hidden)
("Beati pauperes spiritu")