[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2023 21:31:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> The question is whether this should be enough of a worry to stop such
> settings to take effect automatically. I am not saying that it should,
> just that this is the metric for making this change.
Thanks for the clarification, now I see what you mean. In this case, I
think Philipp made a good suggestion to use another predicate like:
(lambda (x) (and (numberp x) (> x 0) (<= x 10))
WDYT?
Best, Arash
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, Philipp G. Haselwarter, 2023/10/12
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, Arash Esbati, 2023/10/14
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, David Kastrup, 2023/10/14
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, Arash Esbati, 2023/10/15
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, David Kastrup, 2023/10/15
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, Philipp G. Haselwarter, 2023/10/15
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp,
Arash Esbati <=
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, David Kastrup, 2023/10/16
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, Arash Esbati, 2023/10/16
- bug#66485: 13.2.1; preview-scale-function should be safe for numberp, Arash Esbati, 2023/10/17