[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible zsh contention in pdfroff (Re: [autoconf] ensure a VPATH bu
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Possible zsh contention in pdfroff (Re: [autoconf] ensure a VPATH build) |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:19:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
To finish at least this one part of the discussion:
* Keith MARSHALL wrote on Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:49:12PM CET:
>
> BTW Ralf, I notice a typo in the above autoconf.info snippet: under the
> `NULLCMD' heading, `If are using an older...' should read `If you are...',
> i.e. the word `you' is missing.
I have applied the patch below.
Cheers,
Ralf
* doc/autoconf.texi (Special Shell Variables): Missing word.
Reported by Keith Marshall <address@hidden>.
Index: doc/autoconf.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/autoconf/autoconf/doc/autoconf.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.963
diff -u -r1.963 autoconf.texi
--- doc/autoconf.texi 12 Mar 2006 19:58:31 -0000 1.963
+++ doc/autoconf.texi 13 Mar 2006 22:43:55 -0000
@@ -11298,7 +11298,7 @@
When executing the command @samp{>foo}, @command{zsh} executes
@samp{$NULLCMD >foo} unless it is operating in Bourne shell
compatibility mode and the @command{zsh} version is newer
-than 3.1.6-dev-18. If are using an older @command{zsh}
+than 3.1.6-dev-18. If you are using an older @command{zsh}
and forget to set @env{NULLCMD},
your script might be suspended waiting for data on its standard input.
- Re: Possible zsh contention in pdfroff (Re: [autoconf] ensure a VPATH build),
Ralf Wildenhues <=